The moment it threw a wrench in the plans though, by acting as a clear and accessible presentation of the widespread harms represented statistically, oh NOW the editors need to 'review' it again.
It's like those other studies which will describe some horrific side effect and then in the conclusion state "it is well understood that the covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective" like a self-protective mantra to ward off attacks on one's career.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
The funny thing is that this paper did have a long review -- it went through 5 different versions with comments from the reviewer before it was published: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-023-07998-3/peer-review
The moment it threw a wrench in the plans though, by acting as a clear and accessible presentation of the widespread harms represented statistically, oh NOW the editors need to 'review' it again.
It's like those other studies which will describe some horrific side effect and then in the conclusion state "it is well understood that the covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective" like a self-protective mantra to ward off attacks on one's career.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Find the article
Jane333.Substack.com