The funny thing is that this paper did have a long review -- it went through 5 different versions with comments from the reviewer before it was published: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-023-07998-3/peer-review

The moment it threw a wrench in the plans though, by acting as a clear and accessible presentation of the widespread harms represented statistically, oh NOW the editors need to 'review' it again.

It's like those other studies which will describe some horrific side effect and then in the conclusion state "it is well understood that the covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective" like a self-protective mantra to ward off attacks on one's career.

Expand full comment

I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange

The article is titled

We breathe air not oxygen

I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement

Including how oxygen is manufactured

How oxygen is calibrated

Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination

Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli

Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity

Can you see the problem?

The new take on lung physiology:

The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds

RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac

The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture

Find the article


Expand full comment