It's at the point that the authorities know, but don't want to acknowledge the harms of these vaccines. It baffles me that anybody on earth can think these injections are safe, but it does show how low info and low desire to obtain info about something so important is to the average person.
The thead that I'm currently tugging on is "male/young as a risk factor for mRNA vaccines." It is such an obvious point, and yet not even vaccine critics have explored its full implications.
If young males are seven times likelier to get myocarditis from mRNA vaccines than females, what to do? 1) exempt males? (2) use a smaller dose of vaccine on males?
If young males are seven times likelier to get myocarditis from mRNA vaccines than females, how to explain this? What does this tell us about differences between male and female hearts -- an organ that is generally considered unaffected by sex difference in children and young adults?
It's at the point that the authorities know, but don't want to acknowledge the harms of these vaccines. It baffles me that anybody on earth can think these injections are safe, but it does show how low info and low desire to obtain info about something so important is to the average person.
The thead that I'm currently tugging on is "male/young as a risk factor for mRNA vaccines." It is such an obvious point, and yet not even vaccine critics have explored its full implications.
If young males are seven times likelier to get myocarditis from mRNA vaccines than females, what to do? 1) exempt males? (2) use a smaller dose of vaccine on males?
If young males are seven times likelier to get myocarditis from mRNA vaccines than females, how to explain this? What does this tell us about differences between male and female hearts -- an organ that is generally considered unaffected by sex difference in children and young adults?