I was just thinking a little while ago, what percentage of the population was "anti-vaxx" prior to the C19, mRNA injection rollout? What about now? I ask, as although I had a healthy skepticism of annual flu shots and was on high alert after my daughter's reaction to the H1N1 jab, I really didn't expect to learn what I have. When I first heard Dr. Bridle speak in Feb. '21, of ADE and the excluded Pfizer data, I thought, holy crap, I need to learn more. I sent the conference video that Bridle spoke at to my former doc boss. She made a smart-assed reply to me, about my computer having been hacked, as iI was sending her "anti-vaxx materials." This was someone who was very well aware of the shenanigans of big-pharma. I've no idea where she is at now (opinion-wise), as she was recruited to give the shots in 2021. She's since retired, but I suspect any conversation around these shots is off-limits. Is the truth finally coming out? It seems so on Twitter, but I don't know. I thought this would be over last summer, when the Israel and UK data showed shot failure. Sigh. Here we are, still living in the alternative universe.
This bring up two great ideas for future posts: 1)the rise of “antivaxxer” post 2020; 2) correlations between national spending on pharmaceuticals and vaccine enthusiasm (I.e. Denmark vs US)
Ms P I’m right there with you! I’ve been waiting to hit the tipping point for over a year. I didn’t believe that once good doctors and analysts started seeing the injuries and the evidence of them that there wouldn’t be a massive uprising of docs and PhDs. Honestly I’ve been waiting for a white coat million doctor march. Ha! Then I figured pissed off mothers would be on bull horns marching through the streets once their healthy children were injured only to discover that most of the moms who had full faith in these products and these institutions don’t even recognize their children were injured by them 😱
"not only did they not perform the safety monitoring they were supposed to. at all. but they go on to claim that doing so is outside their purview and suggest asking the FDA instead. (who does not do this work, it’s supposed to be the CDC.)"
I wasn’t shocked that fda and cdc were pretending the safety signals weren’t glaringly obvious, but I was surprised that there wasn’t an overwhelming number of scientists jumping up and down screaming about it at the tops of their lungs. I assumed that good honest scientists - and I work w many - weren’t seeing this. I was shocked. Apparently very naive on my part. I don’t know how much of it is that their paradigms which frame the world in such a way that products labeled vaccines are unquestionable (like sacred magical elixers), and this actually blinds them to the data available. They can’t see the ships coming closer to shore. That’s as generous as I can be.
A lot of effort was expended on Twitter to malign and harass prominent scientists /MDs who mentioned VAERS. Not sure how much this bullying type behaviour scared people off. I have found that even among otherwise strident critics of Covid policies such as Martin Kuldorff or Vinay Prasad there is amazing silence around VAERS
Yes amazing silence. I have been perplexed by cardiac damage being the only type of injury somewhat openly acknowledged. Is it because it is undeniable in a way that neurological injuries aren’t? Is it because we have better tests, more easily measured?
You would think that cardiac damage being obvious and known would scare the heck out of the population, but it seems to be accepted as a risk if the chances of catching a non dangerous virus (to most) is slightly reduced.
Best marketing campaign in history, for both a cold bug and a dangerous injection. Mad Men would be jealous at the success of it.
I was just thinking a little while ago, what percentage of the population was "anti-vaxx" prior to the C19, mRNA injection rollout? What about now? I ask, as although I had a healthy skepticism of annual flu shots and was on high alert after my daughter's reaction to the H1N1 jab, I really didn't expect to learn what I have. When I first heard Dr. Bridle speak in Feb. '21, of ADE and the excluded Pfizer data, I thought, holy crap, I need to learn more. I sent the conference video that Bridle spoke at to my former doc boss. She made a smart-assed reply to me, about my computer having been hacked, as iI was sending her "anti-vaxx materials." This was someone who was very well aware of the shenanigans of big-pharma. I've no idea where she is at now (opinion-wise), as she was recruited to give the shots in 2021. She's since retired, but I suspect any conversation around these shots is off-limits. Is the truth finally coming out? It seems so on Twitter, but I don't know. I thought this would be over last summer, when the Israel and UK data showed shot failure. Sigh. Here we are, still living in the alternative universe.
This bring up two great ideas for future posts: 1)the rise of “antivaxxer” post 2020; 2) correlations between national spending on pharmaceuticals and vaccine enthusiasm (I.e. Denmark vs US)
Ms P I’m right there with you! I’ve been waiting to hit the tipping point for over a year. I didn’t believe that once good doctors and analysts started seeing the injuries and the evidence of them that there wouldn’t be a massive uprising of docs and PhDs. Honestly I’ve been waiting for a white coat million doctor march. Ha! Then I figured pissed off mothers would be on bull horns marching through the streets once their healthy children were injured only to discover that most of the moms who had full faith in these products and these institutions don’t even recognize their children were injured by them 😱
The “plausible deniability” ship sailed a long time ago…
El Gato Malo wrote about this in June....https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/how-do-you-miss-the-most-blatant
"not only did they not perform the safety monitoring they were supposed to. at all. but they go on to claim that doing so is outside their purview and suggest asking the FDA instead. (who does not do this work, it’s supposed to be the CDC.)"
It just seems crazy...
I wasn’t shocked that fda and cdc were pretending the safety signals weren’t glaringly obvious, but I was surprised that there wasn’t an overwhelming number of scientists jumping up and down screaming about it at the tops of their lungs. I assumed that good honest scientists - and I work w many - weren’t seeing this. I was shocked. Apparently very naive on my part. I don’t know how much of it is that their paradigms which frame the world in such a way that products labeled vaccines are unquestionable (like sacred magical elixers), and this actually blinds them to the data available. They can’t see the ships coming closer to shore. That’s as generous as I can be.
A lot of effort was expended on Twitter to malign and harass prominent scientists /MDs who mentioned VAERS. Not sure how much this bullying type behaviour scared people off. I have found that even among otherwise strident critics of Covid policies such as Martin Kuldorff or Vinay Prasad there is amazing silence around VAERS
Yes amazing silence. I have been perplexed by cardiac damage being the only type of injury somewhat openly acknowledged. Is it because it is undeniable in a way that neurological injuries aren’t? Is it because we have better tests, more easily measured?
You would think that cardiac damage being obvious and known would scare the heck out of the population, but it seems to be accepted as a risk if the chances of catching a non dangerous virus (to most) is slightly reduced.
Best marketing campaign in history, for both a cold bug and a dangerous injection. Mad Men would be jealous at the success of it.